Comment by InsideOutSanta
11 hours ago
I'm arguing against the actual point you made. You made the pedantic argument about "bootlegs" to distract from my argument. Now you've also decided to insult me.
To what end? Do you think that kind of approach convinces anyone?
There is no "fake android," either. Your whole argument is based on two false premises.
I din't make an argument about "bootleg", I just used the term and you argued it.
Besides, depending on the actual OSI license, you can definitely have bootlegs if you really care to argue.
A bootleg does not need to be exploited commercially. It can just be counterfeit.
I am not insulting you. I am telling you that you are being overly pedantic while being wrong at the same time. You might find this difficult to accept but I'm just calling it.
You started arguing about it:
> I said bootleg Android didnt I?
And you're still doing it. Just let it go. It doesn't matter, your argument is wrong either way.
Also, please stop insulting me.
You are just not making any sense. Your very first comment is the one taking offense with the word 'bootleg' erroneously...
If your worry is about phone-home, no need to mention Android specifically. This happens with all off the shelf phones. Point is about a phone that has an OS that looks like what you would expect and just doesn't do what you expect. Obviously you didn't understand what I had written so I had to call you on that. You may feel insulted, does not mean that I am insulting you.
Anyway, just so that it is clear. Probably should end the conversation here so no one feels insulted any further.