← Back to context

Comment by ericmay

12 hours ago

It's not a good analogy though. Unions aren't a clear public good.

> The way those arguments are made is similarly ignorant of history, is the simple point.

Yes and that point is rejected by me.

The comparison is the unambiguous gains for society union labour organisation achieved through industrial history, which was a clear public good, and what is lost if there are no longer unions to defend those gains.

Stuff can go backwards and currently in the USA absolutely is going backwards, at a federal, state and commercial level. Unions, even in their flawed American form, are a force pushing back on that.

You still need them. In just the same way that you still need continued vaccination to protect the gains made by vaccination.

I am obviously not bothered if you reject my points; I am disappointed with the way you argue, though.