← Back to context

Comment by altmanaltman

17 hours ago

I went through the post because of your comment but it really doesn't look like AI slop. Can you please share why you feel like its slop and not written by a human? I can also say "should have started writing your own comments" to you and its unfalsifiable. Blanket accusations with no proof is not a good move really.

"This post is about what those ports buy, measured, and what they cost."

if you've done any amount of optimizaation or hill-climbing work (kernel optimization, autoresearch type shit), you would know that these models LOVE the terms "buy" and "cost" in this sense. they use them nearly constantly (along with "budget", and even "credit" (even when working with RL/credit assignment!))

The post is full of signs. Here's only a couple of examples:

> The method, the measurements, and what it costs us.

> That is the general shape of these wins.

> Parity is the gate, speed is the follow-up

I could go on and on, but you probably get the point. If you don't find anything funny with the above, you might have not been enough-exposed to slop.

  • What do you mean you could go on and on? Why do you think those sentences are AI written.

    And okay, your second argument is that I just don't know slop because I am not exposed to it? But you don't know anything about me or what I am exposed.

    You're just making random claims and stating they are correct without any evidence or arguments.