← Back to context

Comment by sethammons

10 hours ago

"Claud said" is a hedge. It is abdication of responsibility. That said, a meat-proxied answer should come with more credibility based on the proxy.

I'd put more weight into my developer proxying system information than my sale's intern. I am expecting the proxy to have given the response a sniff test

I appreciate "Claude said...", because it helps me assign an appropriate level of trust in the information.

  • The appropriate level of trust would be whatever trust you place in a colleague's human responses, because you trust they have verified what "claude said" for correctness.

    Unless you're saying claude is more trustworthy than your colleagues?

    • Depends on what they wrote alongside. Ideally, I get more than just a dump of Claude's response. Ideally, they summarize what they regard to be the key point.

      This might be why I'm having difficulty understanding why people are upset about "Claude said..." responses. I would be disappointed too if someone just said "Claude said...", but in general I don't get messages like that in chat. In general, I get some additional input of what the person thinks about Claude's response.

      So, yeah, if someone just gives you a dump of what Claude said, that's disappointing.