← Back to context Comment by frollogaston 5 hours ago Cities don't need ever-increasing populations to thrive. 2 comments frollogaston Reply echelon 5 hours ago Both populations and supply can remain static as demand pushes up prices and swaps lower earners for high net worth people.Classic supply/demand. frollogaston 5 hours ago Yeah, that's fine too. If it weren't fine, there wouldn't be increasing demand. If it became too lopsided and thus expensive to live there, it'd become less desirable. CA has plenty of cheaper cities too.
echelon 5 hours ago Both populations and supply can remain static as demand pushes up prices and swaps lower earners for high net worth people.Classic supply/demand. frollogaston 5 hours ago Yeah, that's fine too. If it weren't fine, there wouldn't be increasing demand. If it became too lopsided and thus expensive to live there, it'd become less desirable. CA has plenty of cheaper cities too.
frollogaston 5 hours ago Yeah, that's fine too. If it weren't fine, there wouldn't be increasing demand. If it became too lopsided and thus expensive to live there, it'd become less desirable. CA has plenty of cheaper cities too.
Both populations and supply can remain static as demand pushes up prices and swaps lower earners for high net worth people.
Classic supply/demand.
Yeah, that's fine too. If it weren't fine, there wouldn't be increasing demand. If it became too lopsided and thus expensive to live there, it'd become less desirable. CA has plenty of cheaper cities too.