← Back to context

Comment by fleventynine

3 hours ago

The solution for this is to pay open source maintainers for their attention. If I want them to review and merge my bugfix I should attach $1000 to the PR.

This is actually not a bad idea for funding open source software. It used to be that you’d have an author who coded a project and then could fix the occasional bug or two quickly.

Now, we have larger projects where it is rare for one people to have a complete understanding, and the main value is a person to reviewing patches and bugs to make sure the changes align with the larger goals/path for the project. There is little incentive for a maintainer to do this, aside from wanting to limit forks.

Paying for that review might be the way to keep this whole model sustainable.

  • Opportunity for gh

    “Here is my pr I attach x$ payable when it is merged” and allow me to add $ to other prs.

    I have been waiting year + for multiple feature in some projects that have open prs and for one I would easily bid 100-200$

Maybe a donate link attached too. The dollars tied to a PR could help set priority of fixes.