← Back to context

Comment by mc32

4 hours ago

I also don’t like subsidizing sports teams. To me it doesn’t make too much sense. Yes I know fans can be pretty loyal and sometimes that team is sort of like a pet dog. They love it through highs and lows. It’s something that can provide some identity to some as well as live vicariously through them. I get it but I feel sometimes you gotta let boyhood ideas and dreams go.

But hey sometimes people vote for their teams to stay despite the negative monetary ROI.

What is weird to me as a European is that sports teams in the US can move. Can you imagine FC Barcelona moving to Madrid?

  • We have funny examples a little bit like "imagine FC Barça moving to Madrid" in the US. Used for comedy (but these are all real examples) from the opening monologue of the film BASEketball

    > The Minneapolis Lakers moved to Los Angeles, where there are no lakes; the [Houston] Oilers moved to Tennessee, where there is no oil. The [New Orleans] Jazz moved to Salt Lake City, where they don't allow music.

    Other names like that are

    - the Baltimore Colts (named for Maryland's thoroughbred racing tradition) moving to Indianapolis (more known for open wheel auto racing),

    - the Vancouver Grizzlies moving to Memphis, Tennessee (which never had Grizzlies even in the post-glacial period)

    - the Brooklyn (Streetcar) Dodgers moving to Los Angeles in 1958 right when the LAMTA took over the few remaining street car lines before replacing them with buses in 1963.

    The closest thing I can think of in European sports, and it's a stretch, is cycling teams. I picked this teams as the first example I could think of, not because it's some egregious example:

    1984–1986 Kwantum–Decosol

    1987–1989 Superconfex–Yoko

    1990–1992 Buckler–Colnago

    1993–1994 WordPerfect

    1995 Novell

    1996–2012 Rabobank

    2013 Blanco

    2013–2014 Belkin

    2015–2018 LottoNL–Jumbo

    2019–2023 Jumbo–Visma

    2024– Visma–Lease a Bike

    via https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visma%E2%80%93Lease_a_Bike_(me.... Also note that the team was newly formed from a schism in TI–Raleigh, where the other half of the riders went to Panasonic.

    The parallel is that the name changes make tracking that team a real ship of Theseus problem: if the name, sponsors, riders, and staff turn over, is it worth calling it the same team? Similarly, if a football team changes cities, names, personnel, and owners, is it worth calling it the same team (Houston Oilers, Tennessee Oilers, Tennessee Titans)?

  • It's a little weird but the teams and the sports leagues are basically just corporations that engage in show business. They have no real connection to where they are located.