← Back to context Comment by estearum 12 hours ago Not really that hard: https://legiscan.com/CA/text/SB53/id/3271094 2 comments estearum Reply nradov 7 hours ago That's just political signaling, not a serious bill. It wouldn't stand up to a legal challenge. estearum 28 minutes ago You must not spend much time reading laws lmaoThis is not even remotely vague compared to what's currently governing us.Surely you can point out specific elements of vagueness, instead of just imagining a counterfactual future and saying "See told you so!"?
nradov 7 hours ago That's just political signaling, not a serious bill. It wouldn't stand up to a legal challenge. estearum 28 minutes ago You must not spend much time reading laws lmaoThis is not even remotely vague compared to what's currently governing us.Surely you can point out specific elements of vagueness, instead of just imagining a counterfactual future and saying "See told you so!"?
estearum 28 minutes ago You must not spend much time reading laws lmaoThis is not even remotely vague compared to what's currently governing us.Surely you can point out specific elements of vagueness, instead of just imagining a counterfactual future and saying "See told you so!"?
That's just political signaling, not a serious bill. It wouldn't stand up to a legal challenge.
You must not spend much time reading laws lmao
This is not even remotely vague compared to what's currently governing us.
Surely you can point out specific elements of vagueness, instead of just imagining a counterfactual future and saying "See told you so!"?