← Back to context

Comment by jjice

24 days ago

> Clearly this is an attempt to prevent similar patents from being weaponised against them in the US.

Why do we assume that Mistral is a "good guy" protecting themselves? I'm not sure they necessarily are. Could just be trying to grab any ground they can.

I mean, maybe they are the "good guy", but I don't think we know either way.

Even if it’s good now, three to five years down the line there’s a 50% chance it’s sold for scraps and this may end up in the hands of a patent troll.

I mean they have a healthy dollop of US VC private investment, so good guys is off the cards - but in relative terms, they seem to follow the law, which in Silicon Valley is certainly not a given.