← Back to context Comment by beering 2 days ago isn’t strong sandbox a good thing? 6 comments beering Reply seabrookmx 1 day ago Sure but it's resource intense enough it should be opt in, or only install if you're using cowork IMO.For what I'm doing, using containers would be secure enough and much lighter weight. ramon156 2 days ago VMs are not a secure sandbox seabrookmx 1 day ago While VM breakouts have been created in the past, they're about as secure of sandbox as we've got! whs 2 days ago Tell that to AWS Lambda and Google Compute Engine? shooly 2 days ago VMs are a secure sandbox. Containers aren't. jdbdbeb 2 days ago What are you talking about, of cause VMs are a secure sandbox
seabrookmx 1 day ago Sure but it's resource intense enough it should be opt in, or only install if you're using cowork IMO.For what I'm doing, using containers would be secure enough and much lighter weight.
ramon156 2 days ago VMs are not a secure sandbox seabrookmx 1 day ago While VM breakouts have been created in the past, they're about as secure of sandbox as we've got! whs 2 days ago Tell that to AWS Lambda and Google Compute Engine? shooly 2 days ago VMs are a secure sandbox. Containers aren't. jdbdbeb 2 days ago What are you talking about, of cause VMs are a secure sandbox
seabrookmx 1 day ago While VM breakouts have been created in the past, they're about as secure of sandbox as we've got!
Sure but it's resource intense enough it should be opt in, or only install if you're using cowork IMO.
For what I'm doing, using containers would be secure enough and much lighter weight.
VMs are not a secure sandbox
While VM breakouts have been created in the past, they're about as secure of sandbox as we've got!
Tell that to AWS Lambda and Google Compute Engine?
VMs are a secure sandbox. Containers aren't.
What are you talking about, of cause VMs are a secure sandbox