← Back to context

Comment by AdriaanvRossum

4 hours ago

I find it almost funny how hostile the response is when a company actually goes through the effort of supporting Linux. Apparently shipping the Linux version is only step one, you also need to pick the right framework, use the right packaging, consume the right amount of RAM, and preferably rewrite it natively.

HN comment quality took a nosedive recently, You can predict the comments just based on the story, almost all of them cynical and snarky remarks. It used to be a place to come and learn from technical experts.

  • We live in an era where companies are increasingly hostile towards their users and society at large. Where regulation has been stripped or ignored to maximize the profits of a handful of monopolies, where companies don‘t even have to pretend to care about their customers anymore, nor the usability of their product. Seemingly companies don‘t even bother to test their products anymore before selling it to their customers. And companies that engage in the most consumer hostile behavior are the ones who are most rewarded for that behavior.

    I think this cynicism is more then warranted. If anything HN is not cynical enough to meet the times we are in.

  • The AI boosters have driven away all experts. They are either financially invested or mindless power users on the level of the proverbial MacOS fanboys.

    Experts related to real programming topics are gone or silent. AI experts have never even been here in the first place. It is all about Electron apps, prompts, agents and other bullshit.

    • This started before AI. I'd pin it on the crypto gold rush attracting knuckle-dragging brogrammers into the industry.

      HR is charmed by them despite their lack of discipline.

Spinning this as a generous Linux port misses the elephant in the room: This is spyware that drags your system down to the level of Windows.

> I find it almost funny how hostile the response is when a company actually goes through the effort of supporting Linux.

How magnanimous: they make the effort to support the OS their entire company is based on? It's not just for training the model and hosting them: it's also to run them, where they constantly use Linux to do their thing.

Without Linux, there's no OpenAI.

So I take it the Linux community should be so grateful that OpenAI supports Linux, right?

  • > Without Linux, there's no OpenAI.

    They use Linux because it's there. If Linux wasn't there, they'd use what's there. There is nothing about Linux that makes it unique enough to be make or break OpenAI. Not one thing.

    And yes, when a company distributes their app for the Linux desktop, we should be grateful or at the very least not hostile.

    The attitude of Linux zealots is honestly tiresome and it makes us all look bad.