Right but it doesn't answer my question about what you don't consider a slop TUI though.
> Slop is slop when the author could not have done it without the AI.
Thinking about Vim (1.) and Linux's adoption of AI, are they considered slop because they adopted AI because the contributors couldn't have done a PR / patch without AI?
Curious what you consider those that aren't 100% 'slop', aside from the common ones.
Because I'm starting to see the word 'slop' as a synonym for:
"This person may or may not have used AI to build software and I don't like it"
Slop is slop when the author could not have done it without the AI.
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_koan#:~:text=%E2%80...
Right but it doesn't answer my question about what you don't consider a slop TUI though.
> Slop is slop when the author could not have done it without the AI.
Thinking about Vim (1.) and Linux's adoption of AI, are they considered slop because they adopted AI because the contributors couldn't have done a PR / patch without AI?
(1.) https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#using...