← Back to context

Comment by armchairhacker

1 day ago

If you really care, a) use an open model or b) obscure your identity to Anthropic.

Otherwise, you're already vulnerable: Anthropic can silently record every change Claude makes to every codebase, maybe they already do.

I hope open weights continue to gain traction for this reason too.

But injecting information into outputs is a little different than Claude keeping tabs internally. The point is that we do not know what information is being shipped with the fingerprint itself.