← Back to context Comment by causal 3 days ago Oh man. Hadn't even considered the watermarking angle. 2 comments causal Reply Retr0id 3 days ago The simpler angle is that more text lets them bill you more. I don't think that was necessarily their intent, but it does mean they have a negative incentive to fix it. StilesCrisis 3 days ago I would have assumed reasoning tokens dramatically outweigh user-visible output. It certainly seemed that way when they were visible!
Retr0id 3 days ago The simpler angle is that more text lets them bill you more. I don't think that was necessarily their intent, but it does mean they have a negative incentive to fix it. StilesCrisis 3 days ago I would have assumed reasoning tokens dramatically outweigh user-visible output. It certainly seemed that way when they were visible!
StilesCrisis 3 days ago I would have assumed reasoning tokens dramatically outweigh user-visible output. It certainly seemed that way when they were visible!
The simpler angle is that more text lets them bill you more. I don't think that was necessarily their intent, but it does mean they have a negative incentive to fix it.
I would have assumed reasoning tokens dramatically outweigh user-visible output. It certainly seemed that way when they were visible!