← Back to context

Comment by satvikpendem

2 days ago

You should check out Grok, it's quite a good deal from the Cursor subscription side but it's cheap even by API prices.

I think it's very clear that someone who has checked out all the models but the one that called itself mechahitler and is explicitly being fine tuned to support far-right politics is making the choice for reasons other than performance and cost. It's not like all the other models even had plausible claims to those metrics.

  • As I said to a dead reply, for coding all of that is immaterial, as long as it codes well then that's all that matters to most people, except it seems those who have an idelogical issue in which case the other model companies also have issues.

    • No, coding does not make ethical issues immaterial. Nor does it justify your behavior of harassing someone to do something that they've clearly decided not to do for ethical reasons on the basis of criteria that they have clearly rejected.

      1 reply →

    • I don't care how good Grok is, it will be a cold day in hell when I give a guy who goes to AfD rallies, instrumentally supported the current Ebola outbreak, and gives the Hitler salute on stage (don't try to tell me he did not, I saw the video) any money I'm not absolutely forced to.

      And yes, OpenAI and Anthropic are highly questionable, too, and so I've ended my OpenAI subscription and I'm moving from Claude to other providers. But even people who do not do that are absolutely justified in drawing a line at supporting Musk, because there's a difference between mere normal shittiess and Musk.

      1 reply →

    • The funny thing is it doesn’t even code well. It’s still worse than OpenAI, Anthropic, and the leading open source models.

      So you get worse outcomes while also financially supporting one of the most prolific pushers of race wars, the destruction of labor rights, environmental protections, and general misinformation.

      Truly a win-win?

      Contrary to your framing it seems to only reason to use Grok at this point would be ideological.

      1 reply →

[flagged]

  • Yeah I'm sure everyone on r/cursor or in previous HN threads about Grok 4.5 or 4.6 are all unserious and insane.

    No one actually cares about the politics as long as the model codes well.

    Edit, quite interesting to see the reception to this comment compared to essentially the same type of comment I made on a Grok 4.6 benchmark HN post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49275385#49275571

    It's true that Cursor gives a lot of usage with Grok, most users of Cursor don't care about Musk.

    • There are a lot of people who are apathetic to what musk is, people that don't care are not people who should inspire you. What the hell is so inspiring about apathy anyway?!

      And yeah, people that don't care DO make the world worse through their apathy.

    • I would say it is sad that there are people who use Grok when there are so many other choices available which don't come with the issues of supporting Musk.

      It is not all just 'politics'. Take a stand on some issues. It doesn't cost much not to use Grok.

    • Voting with your wallet is still very much a valid way to protest that odious man.

      Some people might not mind (or even know), but I sleep better at night trying to work as ethically as I can.

    • > No one actually cares about the politics as long as the model codes well.

      I do. There are enough models to choose from that I don't need to use one from a guy who did a nazi salute at the presidential podium, and proceeded to rid our government of brown people he felt didn't deserve their job.

    • "No one actually cares about the politics as long as the model codes well."

      > I totally care about politics, especially when it comes to not giving my money to people like musk.

    • i care about not financially supporting a person that is actively trying to disenfranchise me, why is that a difficult concept for some people? that not everyone is motivated exclusively by financial profit? is moral bankruptcy so pervasive that some people assume it is unanimous?

      2 replies →