← Back to context

Comment by marstall

16 hours ago

cool. i like what you've done here with a virtual panel that can answer questions ... i have similar ideas for kabuki syndrome (currently: https://www.thekabukipapers.org). talk? marstall at gmail.

> i like what you've done here with a virtual panel that can answer questions

Thats the main thing. I think that Ai-native governance by domain experts is how AI reaches its full potential. Not in theory but in terms of the value it delivers to populations via outcomes.

AI-native Governance is like irrigation for the outcomes populations want to achieve, starts with intents; executed on by programs that use protocols as guardrails. This is a gross oversimplification of the process but based what i see from your work you will get the abstract.

Examples -

dietmanager.com - RDN governance

crohns.ai - AGA (MD/GI) governance

<city>.us.codify.city - City council Governance

  https://san-francisco.ca.us.codify.city/

  https://new-york.ny.us.codify.city/

  http://chicago.il.us.codify.city/

Even applies to YC: https://openyc.org

Each codify.* is a PDA [Public Domain Agent] - that gets delegated intents per request and has to manage its own "deal" - its also managed democratically via ontology and downline policies set by the experts in said field and has feedback loop to verify/optimize policy outcomes.

This concept applies to everything IMO, and I cannot say I fully understand it but im absolutely obsessed with the exploration of the idea; again - in practice not theory. I have real outcomes in healthcare, education and housing.

  • I just fixed Crohn's AI council, it's now all members of the AGA but i'm having serious issues keeping it all up.

    The jobs to harvest the corpus needed to create each agent is not scaling well.

    Note: crohns.ai: 3,948 gastroenterologists, dietmanager.com: 1,752 RDNs