Comment by KronisLV

> I suspect it's because the LLM simply does not focus well enough on a single method.

Consider asking it to use sub-agents or dynamic workflows for that, then the context will be polluted less by the surrounding stuff, UNLESS you wanna babysit it through let's say 5-10 files first and then write down the desired results in some plan file that each of the sub-agents would get.

Personally, Opus 5 has been kinda inconsistent for me - sometimes the technical capabilities are very much there, other times it's a bit dumb, but almost always the tone is insufferable and obnoxious LinkedIn speak, no matter what I try. Nowadays using Kimi K3 and GLM 5.3 more, though they exhibit similar issues with performance, grass is greener only in regards to tone.