← Back to context

Comment by 32191868

12 hours ago

Emscripten-forge looks like 32-bit.

I don't understand the article. It stresses that you don't need to run code on a Python server any more.

That assumes that the only option for scientists is to interact with the browser. Scientists used to be able to write Fortran and didn't rely on a crappy web interface. That was of course when they did science instead of blogging about tools.

I find your take a little lacking in nuance...

It's not the only option but jupyter notebooks are excellent for (at least) quick prototyping, data visualisation, literate programming and exploring ideas. I write plenty of Fortran and C++ and I still reach for notebooks when appropriate. In discussing with a non-technical, scientist friend, she pointed out that existing notebooks can be used and edited by folk even if they don't know python that well.

At the very least I see this particular tech as enabling more science by removing the operational challenge of running a jupyter server.

These tools take nothing from those who want to write fortran to do their science but make computation more accessible to those who don't.