People share bits of their company internals all the time, and often in such a way they that is so vague and general that they don't really violate any NDAs. Your NDA likely isn't that strict anyway.
Frankly yes. Do it in a way that doesn’t violate outright or cover your tracks. Customers deserve to know the truth of the type of company they are dealing with.
So someone should potentially get fired and face legal action to satisfy your curiosity which you'll get sated anyway when you read the postmortem in a few days?
It’s not like OP is putting a gun to anyone’s head!! If they want to share we’d appreciate but there is no obligation.
Are you also shocked that you can stand in the middle of the highway and get hit by a car and die? You can do it if someone asks you but you’re not forced to.
It's not the postmortem du jour that we want, the whole pattern is a mystery. Do they push releases every day and bring down the site every day by botched rollouts? What really is it why they can't GH keep the core service running (e.g. pushing commits and pulling changes)?
People share bits of their company internals all the time, and often in such a way they that is so vague and general that they don't really violate any NDAs. Your NDA likely isn't that strict anyway.
See: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49353915
Disclaimer: not a lawyer
Not necessarily. It's quite common for friends of friends to spread half-truth rumors.
Frankly yes. Do it in a way that doesn’t violate outright or cover your tracks. Customers deserve to know the truth of the type of company they are dealing with.
So someone should potentially get fired and face legal action to satisfy your curiosity which you'll get sated anyway when you read the postmortem in a few days?
It’s not like OP is putting a gun to anyone’s head!! If they want to share we’d appreciate but there is no obligation.
Are you also shocked that you can stand in the middle of the highway and get hit by a car and die? You can do it if someone asks you but you’re not forced to.
We can only ask.
Don't act shocked.
Also, gritty insider information is never the same as the official word.
It's not the postmortem du jour that we want, the whole pattern is a mystery. Do they push releases every day and bring down the site every day by botched rollouts? What really is it why they can't GH keep the core service running (e.g. pushing commits and pulling changes)?