← Back to context Comment by 12ah6 1 day ago Top comment is quite naive. With that populist rhetoric you can defend anything. 4 comments 12ah6 Reply d4mi3n 1 day ago Can we contribute to the dialog rather than bash someone’s thoughts on it?As a start, why do you disagree and how would you further this discussion? andrewstuart 1 day ago Cause they are anti LLM and it seems such people need to not just have their stance but whack everyone with it. saidnooneever 21 hours ago i am anti llm for my own reasons but i dont expect others to be copies of me :-). its very silly to be negative to others or their works just because you have a different opinion. saidnooneever 21 hours ago why is it naive and populist rethoric? any reasoning behind that comment?
d4mi3n 1 day ago Can we contribute to the dialog rather than bash someone’s thoughts on it?As a start, why do you disagree and how would you further this discussion? andrewstuart 1 day ago Cause they are anti LLM and it seems such people need to not just have their stance but whack everyone with it. saidnooneever 21 hours ago i am anti llm for my own reasons but i dont expect others to be copies of me :-). its very silly to be negative to others or their works just because you have a different opinion.
andrewstuart 1 day ago Cause they are anti LLM and it seems such people need to not just have their stance but whack everyone with it. saidnooneever 21 hours ago i am anti llm for my own reasons but i dont expect others to be copies of me :-). its very silly to be negative to others or their works just because you have a different opinion.
saidnooneever 21 hours ago i am anti llm for my own reasons but i dont expect others to be copies of me :-). its very silly to be negative to others or their works just because you have a different opinion.
Can we contribute to the dialog rather than bash someone’s thoughts on it?
As a start, why do you disagree and how would you further this discussion?
Cause they are anti LLM and it seems such people need to not just have their stance but whack everyone with it.
i am anti llm for my own reasons but i dont expect others to be copies of me :-). its very silly to be negative to others or their works just because you have a different opinion.
why is it naive and populist rethoric? any reasoning behind that comment?