← Back to context Comment by ai_critic 16 hours ago [flagged] 4 comments ai_critic Reply linkregister 16 hours ago I'm assuming you meant "heterogeneity" for your statement to make sense. (And I agree with your statement given that revision) WarmWash 16 hours ago They are saying "If having a group of like mined people creates instability, show your work." linkregister 15 hours ago If that's the case, it makes no sense. The parent statement is claiming that homogeneity is "easy mode". How is this congruent with your statement? danlitt 15 hours ago Nazi Germany?
linkregister 16 hours ago I'm assuming you meant "heterogeneity" for your statement to make sense. (And I agree with your statement given that revision) WarmWash 16 hours ago They are saying "If having a group of like mined people creates instability, show your work." linkregister 15 hours ago If that's the case, it makes no sense. The parent statement is claiming that homogeneity is "easy mode". How is this congruent with your statement? danlitt 15 hours ago Nazi Germany?
WarmWash 16 hours ago They are saying "If having a group of like mined people creates instability, show your work." linkregister 15 hours ago If that's the case, it makes no sense. The parent statement is claiming that homogeneity is "easy mode". How is this congruent with your statement? danlitt 15 hours ago Nazi Germany?
linkregister 15 hours ago If that's the case, it makes no sense. The parent statement is claiming that homogeneity is "easy mode". How is this congruent with your statement?
I'm assuming you meant "heterogeneity" for your statement to make sense. (And I agree with your statement given that revision)
They are saying "If having a group of like mined people creates instability, show your work."
If that's the case, it makes no sense. The parent statement is claiming that homogeneity is "easy mode". How is this congruent with your statement?
Nazi Germany?