← Back to context Comment by gruez 10 hours ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampering_with_evidence 5 comments gruez Reply bdangubic 10 hours ago First, that is not an actual statute and second exactly what "evidence" is my phone, evidence of what exactly? LoganDark 10 hours ago Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong. hamper653 9 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
bdangubic 10 hours ago First, that is not an actual statute and second exactly what "evidence" is my phone, evidence of what exactly? LoganDark 10 hours ago Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong. hamper653 9 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
LoganDark 10 hours ago Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong. hamper653 9 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
First, that is not an actual statute and second exactly what "evidence" is my phone, evidence of what exactly?
Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong.
> even if they had no reason for suspicion
Are you sure about that?
2 replies →