← Back to context Comment by gruez 12 hours ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tampering_with_evidence 5 comments gruez Reply bdangubic 12 hours ago First, that is not an actual statute and second exactly what "evidence" is my phone, evidence of what exactly? LoganDark 11 hours ago Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong. hamper653 11 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
bdangubic 12 hours ago First, that is not an actual statute and second exactly what "evidence" is my phone, evidence of what exactly? LoganDark 11 hours ago Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong. hamper653 11 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
LoganDark 11 hours ago Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong. hamper653 11 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
hamper653 11 hours ago > even if they had no reason for suspicionAre you sure about that? 2 replies →
First, that is not an actual statute and second exactly what "evidence" is my phone, evidence of what exactly?
Evidence of anything. You're tampering with evidence if you act to prevent them from seeing something, even if they had no reason for suspicion. Like how you get arrested for fleeing even if you didn't do anything wrong.
> even if they had no reason for suspicion
Are you sure about that?
2 replies →