← Back to context

Comment by ang_cire

5 hours ago

Nonviolent felonies are tools of oppression.

Edit: since this is apparently somewhat controversial, perhaps some explanation is in order.

"Felony" has no set definition of which crimes it must apply to, it is entirely based on the discretion of the locality setting the laws. What is a felony in one place can often be a misdemeanor in another. This is especially true for nonviolent crimes.

It's also been shown in studies that nonviolent felonies are imposed against minorities at a much higher rate, for the same crimes.

And because felonies carry additional, lifelong consequences, they are an effective way to mask a 2-tiered justice system.

> It's also been shown in studies that nonviolent felonies are imposed against minorities at a much higher rate, for the same crimes.

This also applies to men, so is it a white matriarchal system oppressing men and minorities?

Felonies are by themselves a ridiculous US idea that are against the entire idea of a democratic society and human rights.

  • Felonies originate in Medieval English common law, Americans didn't invent them.

If someone were to embezzle a million dollars from a charity they worked for, is that worth a year of prison to you, or just a misdemeanor? Because that is the definition of a felony.

  • When a charity *worker* embezzles money, they're more like to be charged with a felony.

    When a CEO who *owns* a charity embezzles money, they're more likely to be charged with a misdemeanor, or not at all.