Comment by SkyEyedGreyWyrm

Me too, specially since it let's me understand how something as crazy sounding as Moore's law could be treated as such from the very start given that it's an empirical relationship and not an actual "law"

PD: Moore's law is from 1965, I had seriously thought it was closer to the 80's, not something developed in the 60's, the progress in that era looks straight out of a novel