← Back to context Comment by ngruhn 17 hours ago agree, despite the em dashes. 2 comments ngruhn Reply jacobolus 17 hours ago For what it's worth, the linked article has only en dashes. (I have no idea whether LLMs use en dashes.) iainctduncan 16 hours ago you mean, because of the em dashes? Five years ago I was happil using them without having to worry about this bullshit. sigh
jacobolus 17 hours ago For what it's worth, the linked article has only en dashes. (I have no idea whether LLMs use en dashes.)
iainctduncan 16 hours ago you mean, because of the em dashes? Five years ago I was happil using them without having to worry about this bullshit. sigh
For what it's worth, the linked article has only en dashes. (I have no idea whether LLMs use en dashes.)
you mean, because of the em dashes? Five years ago I was happil using them without having to worry about this bullshit. sigh