Comment by wredcoll
2 hours ago
I'm not sure if I disagree with you or not, but this argument isn't very convincing.
> Consistent with what? As according to whom? For what purpose?
Consistent with.. itself! According to.. the people working on it! For the purpose of making it easier to read/write/understand!
Like, I'm willing to entertain arguments that it doesn't actually accomplish this, but these are questions with pretty obvious answers.
A lot of this conversation depends on the definition of "Style" we're using though.
I assumed it meant things like tabs/spaces/bracket placement/semicolon usage and so forth.
If you meant something much higher level, like, dunno, object orientation or what not, then that's an entirely different conversation.
As a side note, as long as we depend on extremely literal character by character diffing algorithms in order to display changes, code formatting is going to have some definite implications.
No comments yet
Contribute on Hacker News ↗