← Back to context Comment by nevertoolate 6 hours ago Are you an AI? 6 comments nevertoolate Reply tayo42 6 hours ago Your right to push back on that... lee_ars 5 hours ago > Your right to push back on that...Human test passed. AIs make giant flashy mistakes. They don't fuck up basic grammar. dofm 5 hours ago I have found it intriguingly difficult in my own tests to make LLMs deliberately fuck up grammar in any way similar to how humans do. I suppose this is actually an architectural limitation. 3 replies →
tayo42 6 hours ago Your right to push back on that... lee_ars 5 hours ago > Your right to push back on that...Human test passed. AIs make giant flashy mistakes. They don't fuck up basic grammar. dofm 5 hours ago I have found it intriguingly difficult in my own tests to make LLMs deliberately fuck up grammar in any way similar to how humans do. I suppose this is actually an architectural limitation. 3 replies →
lee_ars 5 hours ago > Your right to push back on that...Human test passed. AIs make giant flashy mistakes. They don't fuck up basic grammar. dofm 5 hours ago I have found it intriguingly difficult in my own tests to make LLMs deliberately fuck up grammar in any way similar to how humans do. I suppose this is actually an architectural limitation. 3 replies →
dofm 5 hours ago I have found it intriguingly difficult in my own tests to make LLMs deliberately fuck up grammar in any way similar to how humans do. I suppose this is actually an architectural limitation. 3 replies →
Your right to push back on that...
> Your right to push back on that...
Human test passed. AIs make giant flashy mistakes. They don't fuck up basic grammar.
I have found it intriguingly difficult in my own tests to make LLMs deliberately fuck up grammar in any way similar to how humans do. I suppose this is actually an architectural limitation.
3 replies →