← Back to context Comment by 8note 1 day ago they certainly havr given that licenseotherwise my browser could not make reproductions and store caches 3 comments 8note Reply GeoAtreides 1 day ago they have granted a licence to HN (and YC-affiliated companies), not anyone else. It's that licence that permits HN, and HN only, to send users' content to your browser xigoi 1 day ago So if someone uses a VPN to access Hacker News, the VPN is infringing copyright? GeoAtreides 1 day ago Transient copies of user data, in traffic, memory or caches, are protected by the copyright law, so there is no infringing.
GeoAtreides 1 day ago they have granted a licence to HN (and YC-affiliated companies), not anyone else. It's that licence that permits HN, and HN only, to send users' content to your browser xigoi 1 day ago So if someone uses a VPN to access Hacker News, the VPN is infringing copyright? GeoAtreides 1 day ago Transient copies of user data, in traffic, memory or caches, are protected by the copyright law, so there is no infringing.
xigoi 1 day ago So if someone uses a VPN to access Hacker News, the VPN is infringing copyright? GeoAtreides 1 day ago Transient copies of user data, in traffic, memory or caches, are protected by the copyright law, so there is no infringing.
GeoAtreides 1 day ago Transient copies of user data, in traffic, memory or caches, are protected by the copyright law, so there is no infringing.
they have granted a licence to HN (and YC-affiliated companies), not anyone else. It's that licence that permits HN, and HN only, to send users' content to your browser
So if someone uses a VPN to access Hacker News, the VPN is infringing copyright?
Transient copies of user data, in traffic, memory or caches, are protected by the copyright law, so there is no infringing.