← Back to context

Comment by Xunjin

2 days ago

Is that cheaper than DS4 flash?

Slightly more expensive than the (post-price hike) DS4 flash pricing, but in the ballpark.

https://openrouter.ai/compare/deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-073...

  • Hm. GLM is more expensive in all dimensions than DS but it has a lower weighted average input? How is that?? Something seems off.

    EDIT: Looks like they are swizzling around the pricing dynamically on that page, on both the GLM and the DS sides, so who knows.

    • I mean, it implies that it has an even better cache hit rate that DS flash, which is impressive, as the chr on DS flash was already really good in my experience

      1 reply →

All I can say is that even if it is, I was almost glad to go back to using DS4 Flash. Because 0XAlpha was just so friggin slow to complete a task because of the level of circular reasoning that it would go over and over into, sometimes even returning no output. If I just wanted something done I would switch from a free model to a paid one which is crazy.

  • Tbh it was also slow because it was being hammered by everyone making use of the free tokens

    • Possibly influenced by that, but I believe that is a different issue. I meant the way it processed a request. It went into so many more loops of thinking.

It's even cheaper than DS4's off-peak pricing. Seems like DeepSeek have some stiff competition now