← Back to context Comment by TSiege 1 day ago They're also much cheaper from an infrastructure perspective to maintain 2 comments TSiege Reply nickpp 13 hours ago Life in the city is more expensive, in my experience though. Richer, with vastly more options, sure - but more expensive overall. Fricken 8 hours ago In the US it's a supply and demand problem. America chose redlining. White flight. More cars, less public transit. They largely stopped building desireable new mixed use medium density neighbourhoods after WW2.
nickpp 13 hours ago Life in the city is more expensive, in my experience though. Richer, with vastly more options, sure - but more expensive overall. Fricken 8 hours ago In the US it's a supply and demand problem. America chose redlining. White flight. More cars, less public transit. They largely stopped building desireable new mixed use medium density neighbourhoods after WW2.
Fricken 8 hours ago In the US it's a supply and demand problem. America chose redlining. White flight. More cars, less public transit. They largely stopped building desireable new mixed use medium density neighbourhoods after WW2.
Life in the city is more expensive, in my experience though. Richer, with vastly more options, sure - but more expensive overall.
In the US it's a supply and demand problem. America chose redlining. White flight. More cars, less public transit. They largely stopped building desireable new mixed use medium density neighbourhoods after WW2.