← Back to context

Comment by erkt

10 hours ago

Inhumane maybe, but our government should owe its first allegiance to our citizens wellbeing, not imported workers.

Surely you would admit that this Administration’s approach to immigration has been both chaotic and cruel. The workers who were given status in the United States expected a predictable process, not one that changes weekly based on the unserious personal whims of a bored, ill-informed and vindictive man. In any case, the prioritization of citizens’ wellbeing writ large is demonstrably _not_ a feature of this Administration’s agenda.

  • The entire point of a temporary visa is that the host country can refuse to renew and force you to leave the country at their whim. When you apply for such a visa you accept those terms.

    • The entire point of a temporary visa is for the country to benefit from your labor. How does canceling it on a “whim” benefit anybody?

  • [flagged]

    • I wish, I desperately wish, this "both sides" fallacy would die.

      There has not been this level of chaos in government decision-making in generations. I have no idea how far back you'd have to go to find a president changing the rules for business arbitrarily every single month.

      1 reply →

The government should not be doing inhumane things to people. This should not be a controversial statement.

How, in any way does this help the wellbeing of a citizen? Why bring up that very strange point, which is completely unconnected to the massive harm here.

If anything, these policies harm the citizens of the US in a myriad of ways. There's zero benefit to be had from any of this. Except for the joy tha tthe cruel feel in causing others misery, but that's not citizens, that's just a few sick people.

  • >There's zero benefit to be had from any of this.

    From the article:

    "Updated guidance and training were being put in place to ensure that visa applicants don’t become a public charge under U.S. law or depend on government benefits intended for Americans in need, a spokesman for the department said Wednesday."

    • The implication that visa applicants are receiving government benefits is completely unsubstantiated.

The first responsibility is to protect the rights of all people in the country. Citizenship is not required for protected rights

  • Why be a citizen at all if non-citizens have all the benefits and none of the responsibilities?

    • They can’t vote in most elections (except a few local elections in some places) and aren’t guaranteed entry at the border. They also can’t work a litany of jobs requiring citizenship.

      They get a plenty bad enough shake. Let’s grant them the absolute basics of humane treatment and a fair shake at getting citizenship, sheesh.

      Other countries get by just fine not having such a huge delta between haves and have nots on citizenship, and their social cohesion is better for it.

      13 replies →

    • What responsibility does a non-citizen shirk? They must follow lows, pay taxes, etc. Even for things like social security.

      I sometimes wonder where these concepts come from, because it sounds like somebody tricked you into thinking that non-citizens are somehow taking things from everybody else, rather than contributing just the same as everyone.

    • Rights and benefits are two different things, surely you aren’t that dumb. Do you think non-citizens can get Social Security or a US Passport?

      5 replies →

The mere suggestion that this admin is doing this or anything else for the wellbeing of its citizens is a complete departure from reality.

It's very clear what the motivations are, and just because they don't seem harmful in isolation doesn't mean it's going to have no consequences for everyone else.

And its going so great for our citizens wellbeing. Oodles of programs for the needy smashed to bits. Corruption and self dealing out the wazoo. Protestors shot to death by ICE agents. A legendarily stupid war fucking up international shipping. Illegal tariffs changing daily.