← Back to context Comment by _aavaa_ 8 hours ago This is an absurd argument. Any one source is a drop in the bucket. 4 comments _aavaa_ Reply DiscourseFan 2 hours ago I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source bamboozled 1 hour ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 1 hour ago So did your moms vibrator but don't worry, I'm helping reduce CO2 production there as well andrewflnr 7 hours ago Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.
DiscourseFan 2 hours ago I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source bamboozled 1 hour ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 1 hour ago So did your moms vibrator but don't worry, I'm helping reduce CO2 production there as well
bamboozled 1 hour ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 1 hour ago So did your moms vibrator but don't worry, I'm helping reduce CO2 production there as well
DiscourseFan 1 hour ago So did your moms vibrator but don't worry, I'm helping reduce CO2 production there as well
andrewflnr 7 hours ago Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.
I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source
Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”.
So did your moms vibrator but don't worry, I'm helping reduce CO2 production there as well
Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.