← Back to context Comment by _aavaa_ 10 hours ago This is an absurd argument. Any one source is a drop in the bucket. 7 comments _aavaa_ Reply andrewflnr 9 hours ago Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops. _aavaa_ 38 minutes ago That’s an argument about sequencing, not of necessity.And as an analogy it breaks down because we need to reduce/eliminate all sources of pollution, not just the current biggest one. DiscourseFan 4 hours ago I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source _aavaa_ 39 minutes ago But not when you look at just one ship, or just one datacenter. bamboozled 3 hours ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 3 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
andrewflnr 9 hours ago Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops. _aavaa_ 38 minutes ago That’s an argument about sequencing, not of necessity.And as an analogy it breaks down because we need to reduce/eliminate all sources of pollution, not just the current biggest one.
_aavaa_ 38 minutes ago That’s an argument about sequencing, not of necessity.And as an analogy it breaks down because we need to reduce/eliminate all sources of pollution, not just the current biggest one.
DiscourseFan 4 hours ago I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source _aavaa_ 39 minutes ago But not when you look at just one ship, or just one datacenter. bamboozled 3 hours ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 3 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
bamboozled 3 hours ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 3 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.
That’s an argument about sequencing, not of necessity.
And as an analogy it breaks down because we need to reduce/eliminate all sources of pollution, not just the current biggest one.
I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source
But not when you look at just one ship, or just one datacenter.
Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”.
[flagged]
1 reply →