← Back to context Comment by _aavaa_ 10 hours ago This is an absurd argument. Any one source is a drop in the bucket. 5 comments _aavaa_ Reply DiscourseFan 4 hours ago I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source bamboozled 3 hours ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 3 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply → andrewflnr 9 hours ago Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.
DiscourseFan 4 hours ago I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source bamboozled 3 hours ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 3 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
bamboozled 3 hours ago Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”. DiscourseFan 3 hours ago [flagged] 1 reply →
andrewflnr 9 hours ago Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.
I think international shipping produces significantly more CO2 than any single other source
Yet the AI boom relies on global shipping to be produced , so “AI” is “additive”.
[flagged]
1 reply →
Any given optimization reduces running time of a program, but you should still focus on your hot loops.