← Back to context Comment by 12j3afAv 13 hours ago I wonder from where Claude stole this fuzzer. 3 comments 12j3afAv Reply pjankiewicz 13 hours ago Or it used something called an "analogy" which is a valid way to solve new problems. criddell 11 hours ago The very first line of the bug report:> This is a bug found with our fuzzer: https://github.com/daedalus/fuzzer/ LoganDark 4 hours ago I think they're talking about the misconception that LLMs can only ever regurgitate their training data verbatim enough to constitute mass copyright violation. And that that's therefore "stealing"
pjankiewicz 13 hours ago Or it used something called an "analogy" which is a valid way to solve new problems.
criddell 11 hours ago The very first line of the bug report:> This is a bug found with our fuzzer: https://github.com/daedalus/fuzzer/ LoganDark 4 hours ago I think they're talking about the misconception that LLMs can only ever regurgitate their training data verbatim enough to constitute mass copyright violation. And that that's therefore "stealing"
LoganDark 4 hours ago I think they're talking about the misconception that LLMs can only ever regurgitate their training data verbatim enough to constitute mass copyright violation. And that that's therefore "stealing"
Or it used something called an "analogy" which is a valid way to solve new problems.
The very first line of the bug report:
> This is a bug found with our fuzzer: https://github.com/daedalus/fuzzer/
I think they're talking about the misconception that LLMs can only ever regurgitate their training data verbatim enough to constitute mass copyright violation. And that that's therefore "stealing"