← Back to context Comment by montroser 12 hours ago Not the book, but the author, yes. 2 comments montroser Reply aqfamnzc 12 hours ago Not the LLM, but the training material, yes. Terr_ 11 hours ago An important distinction, because I worry about this circular-reasoning loop:1. "LLMs have empathy since they write empathetic things."2. "How do you know its their own empathy?"3. "LLMs are authors, just like humans are."4. "How do you know that they are that kind of author?"5. [GOTO 1]
aqfamnzc 12 hours ago Not the LLM, but the training material, yes. Terr_ 11 hours ago An important distinction, because I worry about this circular-reasoning loop:1. "LLMs have empathy since they write empathetic things."2. "How do you know its their own empathy?"3. "LLMs are authors, just like humans are."4. "How do you know that they are that kind of author?"5. [GOTO 1]
Terr_ 11 hours ago An important distinction, because I worry about this circular-reasoning loop:1. "LLMs have empathy since they write empathetic things."2. "How do you know its their own empathy?"3. "LLMs are authors, just like humans are."4. "How do you know that they are that kind of author?"5. [GOTO 1]
Not the LLM, but the training material, yes.
An important distinction, because I worry about this circular-reasoning loop:
1. "LLMs have empathy since they write empathetic things."
2. "How do you know its their own empathy?"
3. "LLMs are authors, just like humans are."
4. "How do you know that they are that kind of author?"
5. [GOTO 1]