← Back to context Comment by BeetleB 12 hours ago Height limiting is anti-progress, which was his point. 3 comments BeetleB Reply smallerize 12 hours ago Ok SF needs somewhat higher-density housing. But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress. If the benefits accrue to only a few people, it's not progress. BeetleB 12 hours ago > But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress.It is if it makes it worse for everyone else.
smallerize 12 hours ago Ok SF needs somewhat higher-density housing. But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress. If the benefits accrue to only a few people, it's not progress. BeetleB 12 hours ago > But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress.It is if it makes it worse for everyone else.
BeetleB 12 hours ago > But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress.It is if it makes it worse for everyone else.
Ok SF needs somewhat higher-density housing. But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress. If the benefits accrue to only a few people, it's not progress.
> But wanting something good for yourself and your peers isn't anti-progress.
It is if it makes it worse for everyone else.