← Back to context

Comment by Philpax

13 hours ago

There are risks associated with releasing historical proprietary models that were not designed for open release:

- It is trivial to extract samples of the training data that was used, which can bolster existing lawsuits/foster new ones.

- Older models are not as safety-hardened, so it is easier to coax unsafe behaviour out of them, which is a PR risk.

- It may be possible to divulge proprietary secrets from the model (e.g. architectural details that may still be relevant).

For these reasons, and more, it's unlikely that GPT-3/similar models will be released until these concerns are no longer relevant (e.g. when they become a purely historic concern, similar to the open-sourcing of other proprietary software from decades ago).

> It is trivial to extract samples of the training data that was used, which can bolster existing lawsuits/foster new ones.

At least to this point, the legal teams could get the model via discovery. IDK that the lawfirms realize that they could get experts (or that they'd have contacts that could) to search the model weights.