← Back to context Comment by frumplestlatz 12 hours ago [flagged] 5 comments frumplestlatz Reply luma 12 hours ago That is a preposterous claim, but maybe you're being sincere. If so, can you provide an example? 0974280943 11 hours ago [flagged] Laurel1234 11 hours ago [dead] frumplestlatz 12 hours ago So preposterous that the UK also labeled at least one of the organizations they provided material support to a proscribed terrorist organization? asib 11 hours ago You're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.
luma 12 hours ago That is a preposterous claim, but maybe you're being sincere. If so, can you provide an example? 0974280943 11 hours ago [flagged] Laurel1234 11 hours ago [dead] frumplestlatz 12 hours ago So preposterous that the UK also labeled at least one of the organizations they provided material support to a proscribed terrorist organization? asib 11 hours ago You're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.
frumplestlatz 12 hours ago So preposterous that the UK also labeled at least one of the organizations they provided material support to a proscribed terrorist organization? asib 11 hours ago You're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.
asib 11 hours ago You're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.
That is a preposterous claim, but maybe you're being sincere. If so, can you provide an example?
[flagged]
[dead]
So preposterous that the UK also labeled at least one of the organizations they provided material support to a proscribed terrorist organization?
You're appealing to another proscription decision that is extraordinarily controversial.