← Back to context Comment by tptacek 13 hours ago It's neither an explanation nor a tautology; it's an element of US law. 2 comments tptacek Reply inigyou 4 hours ago It was clearly written as an explanation. The alternative is that you didn't intend for the words you wrote to have any meaning, in which case why did you write them? jijijijij 13 hours ago So if those prior sentences or yours are not related, your argument is part wrong, part irrelevant/nonsensical. Good talk.
inigyou 4 hours ago It was clearly written as an explanation. The alternative is that you didn't intend for the words you wrote to have any meaning, in which case why did you write them?
jijijijij 13 hours ago So if those prior sentences or yours are not related, your argument is part wrong, part irrelevant/nonsensical. Good talk.
It was clearly written as an explanation. The alternative is that you didn't intend for the words you wrote to have any meaning, in which case why did you write them?
So if those prior sentences or yours are not related, your argument is part wrong, part irrelevant/nonsensical. Good talk.