← Back to context Comment by joquarky 2 days ago https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning 3 comments joquarky Reply Manuel_D 2 days ago Pointing out the incorrect assumption that Flock is doing something illegal is not sealioning. There's a reason why none of the replies actually point to the law that Flock is supposedly breaking: because there isn't one. joquarky 11 hours ago Sealioning is a style of trolling, not a logical fallacy. Manuel_D 10 hours ago And what about pointing out the fact that Flock's activities are legal, contrary to what people claim, is trolling?
Manuel_D 2 days ago Pointing out the incorrect assumption that Flock is doing something illegal is not sealioning. There's a reason why none of the replies actually point to the law that Flock is supposedly breaking: because there isn't one. joquarky 11 hours ago Sealioning is a style of trolling, not a logical fallacy. Manuel_D 10 hours ago And what about pointing out the fact that Flock's activities are legal, contrary to what people claim, is trolling?
joquarky 11 hours ago Sealioning is a style of trolling, not a logical fallacy. Manuel_D 10 hours ago And what about pointing out the fact that Flock's activities are legal, contrary to what people claim, is trolling?
Manuel_D 10 hours ago And what about pointing out the fact that Flock's activities are legal, contrary to what people claim, is trolling?
Pointing out the incorrect assumption that Flock is doing something illegal is not sealioning. There's a reason why none of the replies actually point to the law that Flock is supposedly breaking: because there isn't one.
Sealioning is a style of trolling, not a logical fallacy.
And what about pointing out the fact that Flock's activities are legal, contrary to what people claim, is trolling?