Comment by akrauss
19 hours ago
Adtech cookie banner on a .org domain for a thing whose name starts with „Open“? No thanks. Won‘t look further.
19 hours ago
Adtech cookie banner on a .org domain for a thing whose name starts with „Open“? No thanks. Won‘t look further.
Your loss then. Although I prefer KDEnlive, OpenShot is not a bad video editor.
And I don't think it's a terrible thing for an open source developer to try to earn a few coins.
Its name starts with Open because it's open-source / free software (GNU GPLv3).
FWIW you can just install it from your distro's software repos or as a flatpak[1] and never ever visit the official website.
[1] https://flathub.org/en/apps/org.openshot.OpenShot
Easy to say. What did you accomplish for FOSS?
Typical FOSS hypocrite.
Mad that “free” software has to be paid by someone.
Oh come on, they only have 210 "partners" they give your data to!
You jest, but with even trivial sites having 900+ so-called partners, "only" does indeed seem apt.
I know, but we're talking about some free & open-source software funded by donations, not a for-profit company.
Funnily enough their not (fully) free and not open source competitor DaVinci Resolve doesn't have a cookie banner and doesn't set any cookies on your browser.
I feel like the only way to have this many "partners" as is to inherit them, at least if you're 'trivial'. Like, they probably chose some ad or tracking script that has so many partners.