Comment by bewareofscams
19 hours ago
How does this compare to After Effects, Premiere Pro, and Davinci Resolve?
I am pretty sure, this thing solves half of the problems the above solve, and it does it half-good.
19 hours ago
How does this compare to After Effects, Premiere Pro, and Davinci Resolve?
I am pretty sure, this thing solves half of the problems the above solve, and it does it half-good.
I am pretty sure you haven't tried it yourself. I am also pretty sure the software you mention is significantly more expensive or at least not open source.
Which makes me pretty sure yours was a useless comment.
I have tried the ones I have mentioned, and I hadn't tried this one, - which is precisely why I am asking!
No need for snarky "but ours is foss smugface" comments.
Not to say, your comment make me pretty sure you hadn't tried either of mentioned by me, and does not take video editing seriously.
I use and pay for DaVinci Resolve Studio on Linux myself, so yes I have tried them and yes, they're obviously more feature packed and polished than OpenShot is.
OpenShot is however significantly easier to use and does what you need for casual editing. If you want a step above that and still FLOSS then Kdenlive is a better choice.
What makes your original comment useless is that it reads like an American saying, 'I bet our GDP is bigger than Nauru's' - like what is the point? You know the answer already. An open source video editor is unlikely to be as good as DaVinci Resolve. DaVinci has multiplicity of the resources OpenShot/Kdenlive etc. do.
So again, what is your point?
7 replies →
I've had great experienced with it. It's almost certainly not as full-featered as premiere pro, but it runs buttery smooth and robust, while Premiere Pro kept crashing frequently and was a bit tedious to use for simple tasks.
It's FLOSS (GPLv3). There are very few free software video editors. Another good one is kdenlive, which a few years back I liked better that OpenShot.
Kdenlive has improved remarkably over the last few years and in many ways not in a way you'd visibly notice, they had a period where it was very unstable/crash prone so they spent a good chunk of time really focusing just on that and as a result it's now incredibly stable, I can't remember the last time it crashed.
For basic video editing it's quite user friendly and you can do some fairly prosumer level things with it (it's not going to match a studio grade NLE but for most people it doesn't need to).
I second that remark about Kdenlive having stabilized most impressively.
This does not answer my question, I need something that can do thing, not how it is licensed. I have used Kdenlive, and it's nowhere near either of these functionality-wise, and struggles with big files.
After Adobe's licensing/subscription shenanigans, I would have expected the license to be more salient in folks' minds.
Unlikely to be near that polish and feature completeness. If you ask "then what's the point?", for now the answer is the license and the source availability.
3 replies →
"I have a long list of wants, and I require someone else who can't even see that list to tell me how this scores, because I can't be arsed."
> I am pretty sure, this thing solves half of the problems the above solve, and it does it half-good.
What makes you pretty sure?
With enough time, love and leadership direction, any art-focused OSS can be the next Blender or Krita :)
"how does this small open source tool developed from the good will of developers in their free time compare to the juggernauts of the fields, with millions in revenues ?"
You know it very well, why do you pretend to ask ?