Comment by MarkusQ

From the article "A more common defense is to say, just in general, people attack Zitron because of Y (usually his style), but they never address his points."

The article "engages with Zitron's work"; the post you responded to merely extended the discussion to speculate on why Zitron might be producing it.

(btw, for the record, I'm an AI-hype skeptic and _also_ an AI-head-in-sand skeptic; as far as I can tell, both sides are full of malarkey.)