← Back to context Comment by tom_ 4 days ago If the author is reading: both complicated examples are the same. 5 comments tom_ Reply quuxplusone 4 days ago Yeah, the second one is supposed to read `Apple&& Cat(Apple&& val) { return val; }` — but the return type's `&&` was omitted by accident. dkenyser 4 days ago I swear I was staring at these two examples for longer than I care to admit wondering if I was just blind or dumb or both. reactordev 2 days ago It's modern C++ so, a little of both I think. 20 years of it and I still have people saying "I should work on my fundamentals" so it's totally fine to be a bit of both. andreasfertig 2 days ago Sorry for that mistake! I fixed the last example. The post should make much more sense now. OptionOfT 2 days ago You probably don't pay for a copy or move there as well.->You probably don't pay for a copy or move there either.(I'm Flemish and made that mistake before).
quuxplusone 4 days ago Yeah, the second one is supposed to read `Apple&& Cat(Apple&& val) { return val; }` — but the return type's `&&` was omitted by accident.
dkenyser 4 days ago I swear I was staring at these two examples for longer than I care to admit wondering if I was just blind or dumb or both. reactordev 2 days ago It's modern C++ so, a little of both I think. 20 years of it and I still have people saying "I should work on my fundamentals" so it's totally fine to be a bit of both.
reactordev 2 days ago It's modern C++ so, a little of both I think. 20 years of it and I still have people saying "I should work on my fundamentals" so it's totally fine to be a bit of both.
andreasfertig 2 days ago Sorry for that mistake! I fixed the last example. The post should make much more sense now. OptionOfT 2 days ago You probably don't pay for a copy or move there as well.->You probably don't pay for a copy or move there either.(I'm Flemish and made that mistake before).
OptionOfT 2 days ago You probably don't pay for a copy or move there as well.->You probably don't pay for a copy or move there either.(I'm Flemish and made that mistake before).
Yeah, the second one is supposed to read `Apple&& Cat(Apple&& val) { return val; }` — but the return type's `&&` was omitted by accident.
I swear I was staring at these two examples for longer than I care to admit wondering if I was just blind or dumb or both.
It's modern C++ so, a little of both I think. 20 years of it and I still have people saying "I should work on my fundamentals" so it's totally fine to be a bit of both.
Sorry for that mistake! I fixed the last example. The post should make much more sense now.
You probably don't pay for a copy or move there as well.
->
You probably don't pay for a copy or move there either.
(I'm Flemish and made that mistake before).