← Back to context

Comment by lukan

17 hours ago

"For contrast: Claude disables training on prompts for organizations starting from the 18 euro tier "

In theory also for individuals?

At least I have that toggle to deactivate that. But how would I ever know if they actually respect that?

This post is only about the defaults, and expectations therefore for Team and Enterprise plans and their organizational controls.

If you don’t trust the company to keep their promise, don’t use their products.

  • I don't trust any company with their word on anything. Luckily, privacy policies are legally binding.

  • How can you trust any company?

    The only company you could think of trusting is one where an external , independent auditor is doing its work.

  • > If you don’t trust the company to keep their promise, don’t use their products.

    Your comment is perplexing. No company on earth meets your requirement. What are you expected to do? Move to a hut in the woods?

    • > Move to a hut in the woods?

      I'm so burned out on the bullshit companies that succeed in tech forcing their will upon us serfs that I'm actively looking into that very thing at this time. Tech used to be fun. Now it's just depressing. I'm ready to go back and take the blue pill.

      1 reply →

  • That is ridiculous. Vote to ensure products have to be legally private and make it a crime to share or reuse your data for anything. This should be the norm that people vote for. The idea that we have to give up privacy so some nerdy pervert can be a billionaire off the backs of people who do the work is absurd.

    Criminalize failure to keep private data private. Arrest CEOs and executives. Put them in jail when it happens.

How do you know an LLM provider does not kill puppies every time you send a prompt longer than 14 words?

  • Because they have no incentive as a company to do that? But do have a strong incentive to learn from user input. (Most cutting edge features are developed private - very valuable to get that into your tool)

    And getting the data is not hard, they already have it. Risky is indeed a bit making use of that data, as that requires at least some humans (as potential whistleblowers). But you don't even have to tell them, where the data came from.

    Whether they do it? No idea, I assume not, but I see a risk.

    • We can easily make it a crime to collect the data and another crime to share it or store it in a way that allows someone else to copy it, authorized or not.

      People always want to overcomplicate everything to benefit 5 super rich people that got rich taking wages from workers and ripping off retail investors. Please stop the pandering. Vote for yourself and your neighbors, don't vote to eliminate privacy so a rich pervert gets to exploit you.

      1 reply →