← Back to context Comment by phoghed 10 hours ago > Not sure at all you actually read the piece.On my HN!? Surprised pikachu 4 comments phoghed Reply orphereus 10 hours ago Don't be patronising. I am pretty sure he has read the article because I agree with him, and I have read the article as well.Surprised pikachu :OOOO phoghed 10 hours ago You agree with him? Even the boomer coded armchair psychology? My comment isn’t even in the same realm of patronizing as that. jumpkick 6 hours ago How is this coded to baby boomer? Honest question; I want to understand the post-war generational perspective. 1 reply →
orphereus 10 hours ago Don't be patronising. I am pretty sure he has read the article because I agree with him, and I have read the article as well.Surprised pikachu :OOOO phoghed 10 hours ago You agree with him? Even the boomer coded armchair psychology? My comment isn’t even in the same realm of patronizing as that. jumpkick 6 hours ago How is this coded to baby boomer? Honest question; I want to understand the post-war generational perspective. 1 reply →
phoghed 10 hours ago You agree with him? Even the boomer coded armchair psychology? My comment isn’t even in the same realm of patronizing as that. jumpkick 6 hours ago How is this coded to baby boomer? Honest question; I want to understand the post-war generational perspective. 1 reply →
jumpkick 6 hours ago How is this coded to baby boomer? Honest question; I want to understand the post-war generational perspective. 1 reply →
Don't be patronising. I am pretty sure he has read the article because I agree with him, and I have read the article as well.
Surprised pikachu :OOOO
You agree with him? Even the boomer coded armchair psychology? My comment isn’t even in the same realm of patronizing as that.
How is this coded to baby boomer? Honest question; I want to understand the post-war generational perspective.
1 reply →