← Back to context

Comment by roosterIllusi0n

4 days ago

The real problem is false positives. One false positives is enough to make the whole thing dangerous. The results can't really be acted upon without risking defamation. If you admit that you redistributed someone else's copyrighted work to an AI company that never forgets, it's an admission of distributing copyrighted works.

The law should have at the very least required offline validation tools that cannot track or retain a copy of the documents being checked.

> offline validation tools

As soon as the validator is available without a rate-limit, just apply input fuzzing to defeat it.