Comment by flir
4 days ago
Not convinced you've got evolution there. You've got adaptive radiation, but where's the natural selection?
The low-black-hole universes aren't going to stop "procreating" because high-black-hole universes exist. At most, all you can say is that if you select a universe at random, it's likely to be a high-black-hole universe.
And I think you can use that fact to argue the theory's wrong: because surely our own universe is an LBH universe? A trillion is rookie numbers. There must be universes that produce vastly more black holes than ours, so the chances of us ending up in such an LBH universe at random are vanishingly small.
> And universes aren’t constrained by a shared environment with limited resources – newborn universes aren’t all competing in a valley with a limited amount of grass.
Yeah, that's what I'm trying to say. Without competition, it's not evolution.
Evolution doesn't specifically require competition, just for replication rate to vary depending on some property of the thing replicating. Competition for finite resources is only one way to create that variation.
"Evolution doesn't require selection pressure" is a new one on me, tbh.
(Just realised I should have said "heritable variation" not "adaptive radiation" up there. Oh well.)
Really? I described in detail the exact kind of selection pressure evolution requires.
2 replies →